Which Programming Languages Do PostgreSQL and MySQL Support?.When to Use MySQL Over PostgreSQL and Vice-Versa?.Same, Same, But Different: What Do MySQL and PostgreSQL Share in Common (and What Makes Them Unique)?.The Basics: A General Overview of PostgreSQL and MySQL.Also, please remember that choosing the right database depends on the specific requirements and characteristics of your project. *Please note that both databases have many more features, and this table only covers some of them. Stronger support for data warehouses with advanced data types Used for data warehouses but could require custom solutions Used for its robustness and extensibility Suitable for many enterprise applications Growing in popularity, especially for complex use casesĪdvanced spatial functions available with the PostGIS extension We also highlight the critical differences and similarities between MySQL and PostgreSQL-and which one is best for different use cases. In this guide, we provide a brief history and overview of each database system. Whereas PostgreSQL is highly compatible with many different NoSQL formats. MySQL is highly compatible with many different types of data storage engines.PostgreSQL was built to be ACID-compliant from the ground up and it’s optimal when concurrent transactions (MVCC) are required, but it is slower and less stable when it comes to read-only operations.

MySQL offers fewer features than PostgreSQL, but this allows MySQL to stay lighter, more stable, and faster at processing-especially when it comes to read-only queries.

But it’s not preferred for read-only operations.

PostgreSQL is preferred for managing read-write operations, large datasets, and complex queries.It is not preferred when concurrency is required. MySQL is preferred for managing read-only commands.If you’re not familiar with these differences, here’s a quick and easy overview: There are no other known issues related to this new build.MySQL and PostgreSQL offer many of the same features and capabilities-but there are critical differences between these two Relational Database Management Systems (RDBMS) that cannot be ignored. We have done extensive testing on our own M1 devices. However, as the code is now native, it should be more stable and more efficient on the CPU. PMS running under Rosetta2 was already pretty fast, so the change may not be significant. You should notice improved transcoding speeds. Important Note: You will need to manually re-install an official public or beta version of Plex Media Server to auto-update to the Universal build once is it officially available. This needs to be installed manually for now and it will not auto-update to newer releases. Please note that this is a preview release. If you would like to test this out, you can grab the installer from the link below. This new package includes Plex Media Server for both Intel and Apple Silicon architectures, so you don’t have to worry about what you are installing. We present, the Plex Media Server “Universal” build for macOS. The existing Mac server versions run just fine under Rosetta2, but native is always better, right? Well, here it is!!! Since the introduction of the Apple M1 chip for macOS, users have asked for Plex Media Server to natively support “Apple Silicon”.

M1 plex server